At-the-wire characteristics

FHIR version
R4 (4.0.1)
Endpoints in cluster
95 of 549 MEDITECH (Greenfield Workspace + production fleet) production
Resources advertised
21 in CapabilityStatement
US Core 6.1 profiles
36 supported
CapStmt shape hash
e0b59cee6ff82efd…
Brands Bundle capture
2026-04-27

Resources advertised

US Core 6.1 resources (19)

Resources US Core 6.1 expects from a conformant server.

AllergyIntolerance · CarePlan · CareTeam · Condition · Device · DiagnosticReport · DocumentReference · Encounter · Goal · Immunization · Location · MedicationRequest · Observation · Organization · Patient · Practitioner · PractitionerRole · Procedure · Provenance

Other R4 resources advertised (2)

Additional R4 resources this cluster's CapabilityStatement lists.

Group · ValueSet

Top recognizable hospitals (25 of 100)

24 of 25 link to indexed hospital pages with NPI, CCN, and FHIR endpoint details.

Geographic distribution

OH (8) · KS (7) · TX (5) · WI (5) · OK (5) · CT (4) · FL (4) · NE (4) · CO (3) · AZ (3)

One observed quirk in this vendor's deployments

Greenfield's public SMART configuration leaks roughly 165 internal infrastructure scope names (`infr-*`, `iops-*`) alongside the FHIR US Core scopes Two consequences. (1) Dev-portal hygiene: SMART App Launch STU 2.2 §5.1 specifies `scopes_supported` as a hint to dev-portal UX about what an application can request. These internal scopes pollute that signal and could mislead an integrator into believing capabilities are available that are not. (2) Surface-area disclosure: each leaked scope name is a free sketch of MEDITECH's internal cloud architecture — taken together, `infr-database-config`, `infr-redis-config`, and `infr-cluster-join` describe a clustered, Redis-backed config store with a vendor-onboarding workflow. Among the EHRs in this map, no other vendor exposes this much internal namespace through its public SMART configuration — Epic and Oracle Health (Cerner) both advertise only the FHIR scopes their app classes can actually request.

From the public MEDITECH (Greenfield Workspace + production fleet) overlay finding sweep (2026-04-27). Full vendor overlay has 4 findings with verbatim quotes and source URLs.

Mock this endpoint

This outlier cluster has too few production endpoints for us to host a dedicated mock under /v/cluster/meditech-cluster-B/ today. The modal MEDITECH (Greenfield Workspace + production fleet) cluster is the wire shape that most production deployments use — that's the right starting point for integration testing.

MEDITECH Greenfield Workspace publishes a US Core STU6 v2.0.0 implementation (dated 2023-05-25) that is anonymous-readable for CapabilityStatement and SMART configuration. Authenticated probing is gated by an authorization_code flow with PKCE S256 and `client_secret_post`; identity is bound to a single operator-provisioned Google ID per client_id with no self-service management. As of 2026-04-27 the consent step rejects developer Google identities at Greenfield's user-to-client allowlist with a bare `error=access_denied` and no diagnostic body; the only documented recovery path is an email round-trip with greenfieldinfo@meditech.com. The Greenfield sandbox runs a US Core version (STU6) in use by almost no MEDITECH production customer per Phase F's harvest of 542 customer endpoints — most customers remain on the frozen R4 v1.0.0 baseline from 2021. Synthetic sandbox modeled after observed MEDITECH (Greenfield Workspace + production fleet) deployment shapes. Not affiliated with the vendor or any listed hospital. Trademarks used for identification only.